|
The North American
Union Plan
|
|
|
|
Largely unnoticed and unreported by mainstream media
in North America is a plan called the North American Union* hatched
in 2005 by President Bush of the US, Prime Minister Martin of Canada
and President Fox of Mexico. The plan has fallen under the radar
of political journalists because it is a highly controversial work-in-progress
on which the three governments are working behind closed doors.
It is, to put it simply, a plan to form a European Union-type coalition
in North America by 2010. If it comes to fruition, borders will
disappear, trade and immigration will be free-flowing and, presumably,
one standard currency will prevail.
|
|
|
|
I mention this because in thinking of this plan
coming into effect in 2010, I realized it will have considerable
effect particularly on business practices in Mexico. Americans and
Canadians generally (almost genetically) require and expect written
regulations to govern business practices. As importantly, they expect
rules to be followed. With open borders more American and Canadian
businessmen and companies will move to invest and live in Mexico,
bringing these expectations with them.
|
| |
| A huge ‘NAFTA’ highway, one quarter of a mile wide,
is already being built in Texas, where private land is being expropriated,
and will eventually reach the Canadian border to the north and Mexican
border to the south. It will become a broad, fast flowing river of
millions of trucks transporting billions of dollars worth of merchandise
through a continent without borders. |
| |
| The Plan does not sit well with those few who have pushed
aside the curtain and looked behind government doublespeak. Sovereignty
over natural resources, currency, culture, and immigration are the
tip of a mountain of concerns expressed by citizens of the three countries. |
| |
|
We must remember that the European Union went through
a long, difficult birth and stands today as an economic triumph,
against considerable odds.
|
|
|
| In my opinion, a North American Union is inevitable.
Its ramifications on Mexico will far exceed those on Canada and the
US, which share a similar culture. The question then becomes what
can Mexico, and specifically Mazatlán, do to prepare itself for the
future. |
|
|
|
That´s a question we are now researching. Watch
this column in coming months for our suggestions.
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Veselik
|
|
Publisher
|
| *now called the ‘Security and Prosperity Partnership
of North America’ |
| To search for it look it up at www.google.com |